Using Class Material Newspapers Finance Essay - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 13 Words: 3986 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Finance Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? Using class material, newspapers, academic articles and government/specialized reports, compare the US corporate governance system with the French system of corporate governance and explain the key differences and common points you identify. As we wish to compare the American and French model of Corporate Governance, we will do so by stating common points or differences following the 8 main points of Corporate Governance. They are the following: forms of organizations in the country, shareholders rights, stakeholders rights, management structure, the role of directors, employees, the government and finally, the corporate social responsibility. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Using Class Material Newspapers Finance Essay" essay for you Create order Form of Organizations: In France, there are a great number of private companies; most often owned by families since generations and generations; for example Hermà ¨s. These types of corporations (private) generally do not sell their stocks, which stay in the same family. However, shareholders in these companies have the same characteristics as in another type of organization. The most numerous form of business in the United States is the model of sole proprietorship (75%) (and partnership represent 8% of all businesses). They are mainly small enterprises and are the easiest ways to start a business in the United States. The other dominant model is the corporation one (20% of businesse). Although they are fewer in number, they represent an important share of the countrys aggregate business receipts (86.5% of business sales). Indeed, many of the largest businesses in the US are public companies; such examples include Microsoft or General Motors Company. These public companies ge nerally have numerous shareholders, who sell and buy shares on the stock market. Shareholders rights and roles: In France, companies shareholders have an important role. The Winter report (2002), aimed at modernizing and tightening corporate law as well as corporate governance through 10 priorities including a set of rules about shareholders rights. The law on new economic regulations of 2001, following existing guidance of best practice wanted to increase the rights of minority shareholders. (Charreaux, Wirtz, 2007). Another major point of this law was to ensure a transparency towards shareholders. In France we can state 3 main rights which are; the right to vote at general meetings, the right to dividends and finally, the right of balance-adjustment in case the company would go bankrupt. In North America, we can identify 6 shareholders main rights. They have the voting power on major issues like the election of directors or major changes for a company like a merger or an acq uisition. One of their rights is the ownership of a portion of the company; indeed, by buying stock, they own something which has value. They also have the right to transfer ownership by trading their stock on the market. They are entitled to the companys dividends (in the case profits are not reinvested in the firm to increase its value). Being a shareholder also means they are allowed to see books and records of the company. This is not a problem for public companies, which have the obligation to make their financial situation public but it can be more delicate for private ones. Shareholders also have the right to sue the company in case of a wrongful act (an example of this kind a lawsuit was in 2002 with the WorldCom scandal, when the company largely overstated its earnings, thus hiding the reality from shareholders). Stakeholders rights and roles: Stakeholders are generally investors in a company, whose actions can have an impact on the companys decisions. They generally meet at the board of directors where they have the right and responsibility to agree or not with a decision for the company or introduce a new one. They have the right to appoint anyone to senior management or get someone to leave the company if necessary. Apart from the board of directors, they can also get involved directly with the company by taking over departments and taking decisions directly. In the United States, their protection is generally ensured thanks to contracts and strict regulations. In France, and since the Winter report followed by new laws, everyone orbiting around the company has increased rights and security. An employee can become a stakeholder and participate in its management better than before. Management structure: France is one in a few countries letting companies have the choice between a one- and two-tier structure. Some companies have a one-tier structure, where the board of directors makes important business decisions concerning the company. Ot her companies have a two-tier structure. This structure means having two boards of directors, the first one (management board) supervises the company and gives general guidelines while de second one (supervisory board) oversees major decisions for the company. The second board is appointed half by shareholders and half by employees. This second board elects the management board. In the United States however, companies have a unitary board of directors with a combined chief executive officer (CEO) and chairman. The unitary board is usually composed of no less than 3 people and up to 24 people. They elect the single PDG, who will be both CEO and chairperson. Employees: Various corporate governance codes have been drawn up by the employers associations (MEDEF and AFEP) under the names of the Vià ©not 1 2 reports and the Bouton report (Charreaux, Wirtz, 2007). Employees in France benefit from a good protection thanks to the numerous unions. They put a lot of pressure on compa nies and the government to improve their situations. They enable employees to have a say and protection even if they are not part of the union. In the United States, the interests of workers are defined through contracts and regulations from the government. Unlike in France, employees do not have any voice in a companys corporate governance (OConnor, 2000). The only link they have to the company is through pension funds, which are important shareholders of companies in the U.S. Pension funds as investment in a corporation is a voice for employees. Roles of directors: The principal conclusions of Mace (1971) were that directors serve as a source of advice and counsel, serve as some sort of discipline, and act in crisis situations. They are also accountable for the strategy of the company. In the United States, just like in France, directors have to be loyal and act honestly, in the best interests of their company. Their mission is to maximize shareholders wealth. France has als o developed a complex system of cross-shareholding where the director of a company attends another companys board. Government: In the United States, the government only provides the regulatory framework, leaving the actors on the market fight it out; the winner take all criteria (Mendez, 2004). They have information control, asking companies to be more transparent to the public. They also have monopoly control with antitrust laws to prevent any excess of power or monopoly. France seems to have more protectionist policies and is also much more involved with national companies with interventionist policies. Corporate social responsibility: Around the world, we have witnessed a growing concern for corporate social responsibility. A study comparing CSR between US and EU (Maignan, Ralston, 2002) showed that one difference was that US businesses mentioned more often their involvement in CSR than French ones. Also, the study showed that US companies did this as an extension of their core values while French corporations did this for customers and national regulations. This brings us to an important difference; French public corporations have the obligation to be responsible (socially) and to publish a report annually. This was introduced in 2010 via the Grenelle Law II. The study (Maignan, Ralston, 2002) also showed that US corporations seem to commit to CSR to look good and add value, not to do something good. Conclusion: Overall, we can say that Corporate Governance is quite different in the United States and France. There are similarities in the players roles however they differ when it comes to employee protection and role with numerous unions in France unlike in America. Both governments have policies to protect all actors and have similarities in the management structure (depending on the French companies choice). To conclude, it is safe to say that both countries Corporate Governances have more or less the same values and goals. Essay 2: Effective corporate governance the chairman and CEO of an organization need to carry out their functions effectively. Please explain (a) what are the respective role and functions of the Chairman and the CEO and (b) what are the advantages and disadvantages of allowing one individual to act as both chairman of the board and chief executive officer of a quoted company. We will now focus on the actual governance of a corporation through two major roles: CEO and Chairman. We will do so and start by explaining the role and functions of both the chairman and the CEO. We can find a lot of literature on the actual role of a CEO. One author (Mintzberg, 1998) decided to run an intensive five weeks of observation in 5 American firms (middle- to large-sized). Unlike previous authors, he did more than just ask top executives to write diaries about their daily activities but spent a lot of time with these 5 CEOs and exchanged mails afterwards to make sure his report was accurate. From this r esearch, Mintzberg developed a framework composed of 10 basic roles of a top executive, which can be subdivided into 3 smaller groups: interpersonal roles, information-process activities and decision-making activities. The first CEOs interpersonal role is the role of Figurehead. Indeed, a CEO is a person put in charge of handling social, legal and ceremonial affairs. Usually, they must attend and lead formal dinners, welcome and take care of important business visitors, agree to and sign various contracts. Then, there is the Leader role as he needs to stay in touch with his subordinates to keep them trained and motivated but most importantly, he must fulfill the needs of the company through the actions of the subordinates. Finally, the Liaison role is more external to the company. Indeed, the chief executive must keep cordial relationships with his network of top executives and other important people. These networks are essential in business and consist of exchanges of informatio n and benefits. When it comes to the CEOs information-process, we can identify 3 main roles performed before processing the information. The first one is the role of Monitor, as the CEO sends and receives a lot of information, coming from various sources. The information he seeks is about the surroundings of the company, to better understand the milieu his company is evolving in. This information generally comes from outside the company thanks to his network (part of his Liaison role). This brings us to the Disseminator role, which is when the CEO shares the right and chosen information with subordinates and the Spokesman role, where the CEO shares the information with outsiders and keep them informed on how the company is doing or what she is doing. The last set of roles concerns decision-making activities. The first role is the one of Entrepreneur as he is the one who takes the responsibility of making changes to the company. The second role is the Disturbance handler where the CEO has to take actions if the company is facing a crisis or disturbance. The resource allocator role explains itself; the CEO is responsible for deciding who has what in the firm and so on. Finally, as a negotiator, the manager is often required during important or critical negotiations. Indeed, he is the one with the power but most importantly, he has all the information. What we can say is that the role and functions of a CEO are very complex and diversified. He must be everywhere at anytime and his actions are critical to a companys situation. We will continue our work by observing the role and functions of a chairman. In a company, the chairman is appointed by the board and his most important role is to make sure of the effectiveness of the board in setting up strategies. The chairman has various tasks; the first one is to lead the board. Moreover, he is responsible for the composition and development of the board. As the boards leader, he must give the right infor mation to the boards members and lead their meetings in an efficient way. He has the responsibility to plan them and involve all members in the work. Finally, he has the role of supporting the CEO. Outside of the board and outside of the company, the chairman also has the function of communicating the companys goals and policies to outsiders. Now that we have defined the role and functions of the CEO and chairman, we will discuss the combined position of CEO and Chairman in a company. Indeed, the role of chairman can be combined with that of a CEO, most often in smaller companies (Institute of Directors, 2010). More importantly, we will focus on the advantages and disadvantages of this concept in a quoted company. Brickley, Coles and Jarrell (1997) recently studied this situation and what it entailed for companies. They came up with several conclusions which will help us determine advantages and disadvantages of combining roles in a company. Even though it seems logical to hav e two different people doing two different roles, there are a few advantages having the two functions combined. Brickley, Coles and Jarrell (1997) argue that a company can save costs linked to separating the two roles. These are agency costs of making sure the chairman acts in the right way towards the company and board. Moreover, combining the roles can give the CEO a different perspective, maybe better, wider or newer thanks to the multiple roles and functions. Furthermore, When a CEO is also a chairman it permits him to have a global vision of the company strategy. Indeed, in a lot of cases, the chairman aims to have good results in the short term in order to impact directly the price of the stock of the company and its image, and to increase the dividends of the people of the board and of the investors. These results at short term are very important for the company but it is also really important to consider the strategy of the company in long term. Indeed, the strategi c choices for the company like buying assets or invest in Merger or acquisition for example are often made in order to optimize the result and benefits in long term and have often a bad influence on the price stock at short term and sometimes on the companys image. However it is crucial for the company to take decisions like that in order to ensure the durability of the companys activity. These decisions are taken by the CEO of the company. This example shows well that it is really important to take decision in favor of the well-being of the company in long term and in short term. Thats why having a CEO who is also a Chairman permits to equilibrate the strategic decision in favor of the investors and of the activity of the company. Moreover, it is really good for the company to have a CEO Chairman because he can understand the different axes in the measurability of the performance of the company and try to take good decisions to maximize the global result by trying to satisfy eve ryone. Also, in case of a meeting of the board the important shareholders will more be able to trust the CEO chairman if he explicates that the objectives of the company are not focused on the stock price but on the revenue of the company in long term, than if he was only the Chairman. Finally, the fact of having a Chairman who is also a CEO permit to keep a strong link between the company and the investors, what can be considered as better for the company. Many authors recommend that these roles should be separated. The Working Group stated that having 2 different people would increase accountability and ensure that the interests of the shareholders as a whole were given due weight (Ford, 1997). Moreover, the combination of the two roles could be a source of conflict because of the concentration of power. If we believe some of Corporate Governances basic principles, there would be conflicts of interests between the CEO position and the chairman position. Indeed, CEOs ha ve specific obligations towards the company and have to protect their own situation while the chairmans position has to participate actively in making a collective decision with the board (keeping the whole companys interest in mind). And the board might have to make the decision by assessing critically the CEOs performance, his choices, etc. The board needs to be able to speak freely in order to be efficient and transparent with one another. This would be difficult if the CEO was sitting at the same table during a meeting. If the chairman is the CEO, then he might not make the objective and right decision, if he wants to protect his own interests as the CEO. Moreover, there is a difference between both positions goals. Indeed, the chairman has quite short-term goals, which are linked to stock prices and shareholders while the CEO has longer-term goals, linked to the companys situation, strategy, future. The problem if both roles where held by only one person would be the difficu lty of making decisions with two different interests. Also, because only one person would have the roles of acting, reporting information and taking decisions, this would leave very little transparency towards the board or the company. Indeed, the CEOs actions could be invisible to the board and this could actually lead to bigger problems like corruption or other public scandals. Separating the two roles would enable the chairman to monitor the CEOs actions and thus protect stockholders interests. Even though there might be advantages to having only one CEO/chairman, it seems legitimate that the two roles should be separated as the chairman and CEO can both concentrate on different (but equally important) aspects of the company. Also, it seems that the demands from shareholders to split both roles are more and more numerous; big companies like Wells Fargo or News Corp. are faced with shareholders demanding that they appoint an independent director instead of their CEO in the r ole of chairman (Semadeni Krause, 2012) Essay 3: In the 1990s, the stock options plans for top managers were seen by many as a relevant instrument for aligning interests of shareholder and management, thus solving many corporate governance issues. Please explain and justify why we could now consider that this hope has failed. An employee stock plan occurs when a person from a company holds shares from this same corporation. Stock option plans started their exponential growth in the 1990s when new technologies firms launched these plans to attract but also retain potential or current employees. Before, stock options were only granted to CEOs and other directors from outside the company. Today, they have become a good way to compensate employees in various industries. Overall, managers believe that being a shareholder would increase loyalty and better performances however, the subject is now highly controversial and we can say this hope has not lived up to managers expectations. Let us start by defining these stock option pla ns (or SOPs). An SOP occurs when a firm releases a certain number of shares to its employees at a fixed price and this for a limited time frame. Usually, this price (or strike price) equals the market value of the given stock at the time. Employees have to wait for the maturity of this option (generally four years) to buy shares. If the stocks market value has increased during the four years, then employees are able to buy shares at an important discount. Once these employees own stocks, they can choose to keep them or sell them on the stock market. This brings us to our controversy on stock option plans, and how they do not live up to firms expectations as they enable employees to become shareholders. The first criticism one could easily make about stock option plans is about the loyalty of the employees. Indeed, it seems that once the new owners of options have waited for the maturity of their options, they tend to cash in their options immediately. There are a few reasons f or this; first, employees may wish to diversify the options they hold, which means they will sell their companys options to get shares from another (maybe faster-growing) company. Second, some employees might simply want or need the extra money and just retrieve their new gains. We could thus say that stock option plans do not always increase employee loyalty, or if it does, only until their stock options reach maturity. The second criticism involves the hope of stock option plans to increase employees performances. We can see why the management would think holding shares would encourage employees to work even better in order to increase the value of the firm on the market. However, experience has shown that these plans increase the risks taken by management. Stock option plans have a specificity that regular shareholding does not have. Indeed, stock option owners can decide whether or not to exercise their options to buy. This means that they only share the success part of ownin g shares, they are not affected if the market price decreases, unlike regular shareholders. Another criticism about stock option plans is that it can put the company at a certain risk. Indeed, it seems that if a large number of employees decided to exercise their options to buy at the same time (if the market price is favorable for example), then the companys structure would be at risk. When employees decide to exercise their options, the firm must, on the other hand, re-issue shares and if the number of new shares is too important, then the value of the remaining stocks is decreased. The most dangerous aspect is that once a company offers stock option plans, it cannot control the day when employees will decide to exercise their options, most importantly, it is highly likely to happen in the same period of time if the market is favorable for stock options. Finally, if we look at a concrete example of failures with stock option plans we can see they can lead to many problems. L et us look at the Enron scandal of 2001 for example. Enron was an American energy company based in Texas. Enrons stocks began to increase thanks to diversification of the company with electricity plants, paper plants or water plants, pipelines, and even broadband services around the world. At the same time, new executives used financial loopholes to hide the companys debts (billions of dollars). Employee or executive stock option plans were widely used in Enron (just like in the rest of the country) and they were making a lot of money, not knowing about the real financial crisis of the company. The real problem was that people within the company were obsessively thinking about short-term earnings, which is not a way to run a company. Moreover, there were problems with the management, who had sold hundreds of millions worth of stock just before the crisis. We can say that stock option plans have multiple risks, either linked to management or employees, and that the downfall may be fa st and brutal. We have witnessed a number of scandals similar to the Enron case like Tyco or WorldCom among others. Overall, it seems that as far as stock option plans are concerned, disadvantages tend to outweigh the advantages for companies. However, Gilles (1999) suggested various possible alternatives to these problems. Some of which include the use of premium-price options, which makes an option worth nothing unless the firm improves its performance by setting the exercise price higher than the market price when the option is released by the company. Another given solution is companies giving and setting guidelines to management, requiring them to keep a certain number of stock options to be eligible for future stock options Collier-Hillstrom (2012).

American Society Today - 1717 Words

The society of America today is total different for most Americans then what it was during the 1950s , 1960s , 1970s and on into the 80s. America today is one were black people have the vote and have the same rites as white men and women. Today the leader of the free world is Black some thing that many though would never happen in there generation. But there are still inequality in America today. Urban ghettos are still mostly full of uneducated black people. Black men in America are four times more likely to go to prison. Drop out rates for black students are higher then white and those going on to collage and university is lower then whites. This problem goose back centres. The problem is not because of today issue ( but they don’t help†¦show more content†¦All these things add together like lack of jobs , poor education and health care meant that these areas became ghettos. With these ghettos came crime. People couldn’t get jobs and they still need to pay the bills and put food on the table. Selling and using of drugs became a huge problem in these areas. Using and supplying of drugs became easer in the cite ghettos with the lack of police in the areas. And with the drugs came crime. The situation was not helped when people could buy a news paper just as easy as a gun. Death by drugs and crime in these areas were higher then any were else’s in America. In the 1970s 30 per cent of America crimes were reported by six cites in America that only had 12 per cent of the total population of America. And these cites had large black ghettos and populations. Much of the crime in America was drug related. This had a ripple effect on the ghettos law and order was not respect. People how became addicts began robbing to pay for there habits. To make matters worse drug gangs started street battles over selling areas of the cites. The governments tried tackle the issue by building urban house for the people of these ghettos. They failed hugely. The high rise apartments became drug and crime ridden. The effects were seen through out life some of them were isolation , marriage break ups . Some governments did try tackling the issue people like J.F.K gave more money to education and jobShow MoreRelatedTechnolgy and American Societies Today560 Words   |  2 PagesTechnology has taken an overwhelming presence within American societies today. Careers, education, volunteering, advertising and now even fundraising can be done solely from one’s computer. With this relatively new trend, companies must take advantage of the time clients spend online to further their own organizations. There are three simple techniques that companies should utilize and implement to profit from the new technological era. The process of affiliate marketing is extremely important forRead MoreDrug Use American Society Today Essay1202 Words   |  5 PagesDrug Use in American Society Today Drug use in America is one of the major issues we face and the problem has skyrocketed over the past three decades. Heroin and painkiller addictions exceed all other countries. It is important that we address some of the causes that lead to the abuse, how to treat the abuse, and how to prevent the distribution of illegal prescription drugs. Drug use in the United States has increased for the past few years. A report conducted by Tobias Salinger from NY DailyRead MoreAmerican Society Of Today Strongly Values1805 Words   |  8 PagesChapter One Introduction The American society of today strongly values and caters to Generation X with advertising, product development and societal norms perpetuating the idea and values of a youthful society; however, a revolution may be around the corner. Just as the baby boomers â€Å"caused a social revolution in the late ‘60s† (Barr, 1999, par. 2), they may cause a millennium social revolution that embraces aging and generates changes in geriatric services. Baby boomers accountRead MoreThe American Poster Family For Today s Society1072 Words   |  5 Pagesdinners. A beautiful blended unit, the American poster family for today’s society. By all accounts, they are significantly better off than the majority of humanity. The contrast of this circumstance to so many others is stark. There is desperation everywhere in the world. How we choose to conduct ourselves when faced with that disparity is a greater question. How people think about and treat others less fortunate is a key factor in how a civilization functions. Society should be focused on core moral valuesRead MoreDiversity Of Film : Today s American Society4019 Words   |  17 PagesProfessor Marilyn Kennedy English 148 H 26 May 2015 Diversity in Film: Its importance in American society. Over the years we have seen the same white story told a thousand times that we have become desensitized to it, never expecting anything else. America was a European-White country but it has become one of the most diverse countries in the world, so American isn’t just white anymore. We are at a place in our society where we can and should be talking about race and one of the best ways to do this isRead MoreMen or Women - Who has the Upper Hand in American Society Today?1550 Words   |  7 PagesBeing either a man or a woman in society today has certain advantages. Most people could identify situations where both men and women have the upper hand in various aspects of society. However, men seem to have the advantage in more aspects of life in the United States than women. Men have the upper hand over women in society in many ways. For example, men receive higher wages, get more promotions, are elected to higher political offices, and are thought of as strong and invincible. The y also getRead MoreThe Gluten Free Lifestyle Fad Sweeping Over American Society Today2291 Words   |  10 PagesProject Abstract: Many misconceptions surround the recent â€Å"gluten-free† lifestyle fad sweeping over American Society today. There is little established research quantifying participation in a gluten-free lifestyle. This study will survey random pool of participants using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk software (n=1,600). A random pool of Regis University undergraduates will be administered a hard copy of the same survey (n=100). The consolidation of these findings will not only elucidate the amountRead MorePatho1203 Words   |  4 Pagesï » ¿ PATHO DQ 2 The American Cancer Society (ACS) is a nationwide, community-based, voluntary health organization dedicated to eliminating cancer as a major health problem. Together with its supporters, ACS is committed to helping people stay well and get well by finding cures and by fighting back. Critical Thinking Questions: Imagine that a family friend or colleague has just been diagnosed with cancer. Explain how the American Cancer Society might provide education and support. What ACS servicesRead MoreSociological Imagination And How Events Affect A Generation s Way Of Thinking1476 Words   |  6 Pagesindividual mind and social status due to nature and nurture, culture, socio-economic standing, geography and other influences. It gives outsiders a better picture of why an individual act and thinks the way they do as a direct result of influence by society. At the same time, it allows individual to better understand why they act the way they do if they can grasp the idea of their own biases and subjective ways of thinking. A quote from Mills in his writing about the Sociological Imagination betterRead MoreAdvancements And Advancements Of Technology1588 Words   |  7 Pagesoptions like chemotherapy and surgery; while not perfect, these options can greatly improve the odds of living in many cancer pat ients. In fact, according to a 2014 study by the American Cancer Society, survival rate for cancers diagnosed between 2003 and 2009 is 68%, compared to 49% in the 1970 s (American Cancer Society). This means that the research is indeed doing its job – and that we are perhaps closer to a true cure than we think. Also, people who have a need for medical aids, such as prosthetic

Conduct in Engineering Technology Management †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Conduct in Engineering Technology Management. Answer: Introduction: This report emphasize upon code of conduct. In this report, code of conduct and its significance has been analyzed in concern of stakeholders. Further, it has also been analyzed that how a business get affect through its code of conduct. Code of conduct is a document which is vital for every business such as some unethical work could lead some companies into serious troubles with government authorities, serious trouble with consumers and some other organizations. It manages the governance and ethics of an organization. Code of conduct is quite crucial for an organization as it affects the operations and all the related parties of the company. Code of conduct enhances the value for the stakeholder. Donker, Poff and Zahir, (2008) have depicted in a study that if an organization manages the code of conduct in an ethical manner than it directly enhances the significance of the stakeholders of the company. It has been observed through the research of Githui, (2012) that through the code of conduct, it becomes easy for the stakeholders to choose the best company and invest into the company accordingly. It has also been found through the study over EBSCO that code of conduct enhance the value of the organization and with the increment in the value of the organization, the value of stakeholders also enhances. The code of conduct helps an organization to enhance its business functioning and through the increment in the functioning of the company, the share value of the company automatically enhances. Further, it has been analyzed that a business is required to mange the code of conduct as it enhances the goodwill of the company in the market and it also attracts the customers to invest into the organization and offer them a good return (Thomas and Cotter, 2007). Through conducting further study over the significance of code of conduct on stakeholders, it has been found that code of conduct sets a guideline for the company to manage its stakeholders and their worth and through implementing these guidelines; it becomes possible for the company to enhance the worth of their shareholders (Palpacuer, 2008). Code of conduct also helps the stakeholders to manage the investment and return through which it becomes easy for the shareholder to manage the invested amount. Further, it has also found that this helps the organization to maintain the fund for further investment. Code of conduct is a crucial study which depict that it is required for every company, individual, stakeholder, shareholder to manage the code of conduct to enhance their worth and mange all the related aspects. Thus through this study, it has been observed that it is easy for the stakeholders and organization to manage the code of conduct to enhance the worth of functioning and the investment of the shareholders. Conclusion: Through this study, it has been analyzed that code of conduct is quite important for an organization to maintain and enhance the ethics of the company. an individual must implement the code of conduct to manage the related aspect. References: Donker, H., Poff, D. and Zahir, S., 2008. Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: A look at the Canadian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), pp.527-537. Githui, D.M., 2012. Ethical issues in the construction industry in Kenya: A critical analysis of the professional conduct in engineering technology management. Palpacuer, F., 2008. Bringing the social context back in: governance and wealth distribution in global commodity chains. Economy and Society, 37(3), pp.393-419. Thomas, R.S. and Cotter, J.F., 2007. Shareholder proposals in the new millennium: Shareholder support, board response, and market reaction. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(2), pp.368-391.